Digital games have garnered increasing attention in recent years. The aim of this study is to examine the concepts of identity, behavioral intention, and educational value within the context of digital games. In this regard, the study seeks to identify the relationships between gamer identity, behavioral intention toward gaming, and the educational value of esports games. The research is designed based on quantitative methods. The population of the study consists of undergraduate students who participate in digital gaming activities. From this population, 726 participants were reached through convenience sampling. For the evaluation of the responses, analyses were conducted using reliability tests, descriptive statistics, correlation, and parametric significance tests. The results of the analyses reveal that the concepts are significantly and positively correlated with one another (p<0.05). Additionally, it was found that participants' views vary depending on their gamer status (p<0.05). In conclusion, addressing these concepts collectively supports the understanding of digital games not only as entertainment tools but also as platforms that contribute to individual and societal development.
Keçeci, O. (2025). Relationships between Undergraduates’ Gamer Identities, Behavioral Intentions toward Gaming, and the Educational Value of Esports Games. Journal of Sports Industry & Blockchain Technology, 2(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15664997
📄Qasim, H., Yan, L., Guo, R., & Saeed, A. (2019). The defining role of environmental self-identity among consumption values and behavioral intention to consume organic food. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1106. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Jiang, S., Jotikasthira, N., & Pu, R. (2022). Toward sustainable consumption behavior in online education industry: The role of consumer value and social identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 865149. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Becerra, E. P., Carrete, L., & Arroyo, P. (2023). A study of the antecedents and effects of green self-identity on green behavioral intentions of young adults. Journal of Business Research. 155, 113380. [CrossRef]
📄Cheng, P. Y., & Chu, M. C. (2014). Behavioral factors affecting students' intentions to enroll in business ethics courses: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 124:35-46. [CrossRef]
📄Zhang, S., Du, J., Yue, H., Li, G., & Zhang, D. (2023). Study on the national identity education intentions of pre-service teachers: Evidence from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Sustainability, 15(16), 12633. [CrossRef]
📄Yee, N. (2014). The Proteus paradox: How online games and virtual worlds change us-and how they don’t. Yale University Press.
📄Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Cook, M. S. (2016). Playing in the past: The role of games in historical understanding and learning. MIT Press.
📄Jia, A. L., Shen, S., Bovenkamp, R. V. D., Iosup, A., Kuipers, F., & Epema, D. H. (2015). Socializing by gaming: Revealing social relationships in multiplayer online games. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 10(2), 1-29. [CrossRef]
📄Castronova, E. (2014). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. University of Chicago Press.
📄Nagorsky, E., & Wiemeyer, J. (2020). The structure of performance and training in esports. PloS one, 15(8), e0237584. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2017). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 347-363. [CrossRef]
📄Choi, B., Lee, I., Choi, D., & Kim, J. (2007). Collaborate and share: An experimental study of the effects of task and reward interdependencies in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 591-595. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [CrossRef]
📄Hamari, J., & Keronen, L. (2017). Why do people play games? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 125–141. [CrossRef]
📄Hainey, T., Connolly, T., Stansfield, M., & Boyle, E. (2011). The differences in motivations of online game players and offline game players: A combined analysis of three studies at higher education level. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2197-2211. [CrossRef]
📄Formosa, J., O'Donnell, N., Horton, E. M., Türkay, S., Mandryk, R. L., Hawks, M., & Johnson, D. (2022). Definitions of esports: a systematic review and thematic analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 1-45. [CrossRef]
📄Reitman, J. G., Anderson-Coto, M. J., Wu, M., Lee, J. S., & Steinkuehler, C. (2020). Esports research: A literature review. Games and Culture, 15(1), 32-50. [CrossRef]
📄Steinkuehler, C. (2020). Esports research: Critical, empirical, and historical studies of competitive videogame play. Games and Culture, 15(1), 3-8. [CrossRef]
📄Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Bediou, B., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., Tipton, E., & Green, C. S. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 77–110. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Seo, Y. (2016). Professionalized consumption and identity transformations in e-sports. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 264–272. [CrossRef]
📄Seok, S., & DaCosta, B. (2015). Predicting video game behavior: An investigation of the relationship between personality and mobile game play. Games and Culture, 10(5), 481-501. [CrossRef]
📄Borggrefe, C., & Hoffmann, A. (2024). Observations on sport and eSport from a systems theory perspective: Theoretical reflections on differentiating sport and eSport and on the functions and consequences of an integration. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 59(8), 1192–1210. [CrossRef]
📄Lin, H. W., & Lin, Y. L. (2014). Digital educational game value hierarchy from a learners’ perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 30,1–12. [CrossRef]
📄Sun, C. T., Chou, K. T., & Lu, C. S. (2025). Identity does matter: Teacher disciplinary attitudes toward digital games. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 21(3). [CrossRef]
📄Hong, J. C., Cheng, C. L., Hwang, M. Y., Lee, C. K., & Chang, H. Y. (2009). Assessing the educational values of digital games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 423-437. [CrossRef]
📄Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., & Chen, F. (2015). Digital games as educational technology: Promise and challenges. Educational Technology, 55(5), 3–12.
📄Tawafak, R. M., Al-Obaydi, L. H., Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2023). Technology integration of using digital gameplay for enhancing EFL college students’ behavior intention. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep452. [CrossRef]
📄Tawafak, R. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alshimai, A., Alyoussef, I. Y., & Aldaijy, A. (2025). Exploring the impact of digital gameplay on behavioral intentions in learning graphics programming courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), ep576. [CrossRef]
📄Jukić, D. (2023). Educational values in digital games. Media Literacy and Academic Research, 6(2), 157–169. [CrossRef]
📄Sharma, T. G., Hamari, J., Kesharwani, A., & Tak, P. (2022). Understanding continuance intention to play online games: roles of self-expressiveness, self-congruity, self-efficacy, and perceived risk. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(2), 348-364. [CrossRef]
📄Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R. & Schellens, T. (2010). Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1145–1156. [CrossRef]
📄Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
📄Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
📄Meadows, K. (2003). So you want to do research? 4: An introduction to quantitative methods. British Journal of Community Nursing, 8(11), 519–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2019). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9(11), 1-9. [CrossRef]
📄Yim, B. H., Lepp, A., Dowdell, B., & Barkley, J. E. (2023). The gamer identity scale: A measure of self concept as a video gamer. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107476. [CrossRef]
📄Kim, Y., Trail, G. T., & Ko, Y. (2011). The influence of relationship quality on sport consumption behaviors: An empirical examination of the relationship quality framework. Journal of Sport Management, 25(6), 576–592. [CrossRef]
📄Ye, J. N., Wang, C. M., & Hong, J. C. (2021). Development of 5 Cs educational value scale for eSport games. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(3), 362-374. [CrossRef]
📄Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
📄Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. [CrossRef]
📄Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
📄Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. [CrossRef]
📄Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
📄Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2017). Statistics without maths for psychology (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
📄Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2016). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (7th ed.). Pearson.
📄Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. [CrossRef]
📄Looy, J. (2015). Online games characters, avatars, and identity. In Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society (pp. 1–6). Wiley.
📄Zacchi, V. (2018). Identidade em jogos digitais: Entre a identificação e a mecânica do jogo. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia, 19(44), 114–138. [CrossRef]
📄Hattingh, W., van den Berg, L., & Bevan-Dye, A. (2023). The “why” behind generation Y amateur gamers' ongoing esports gameplay intentions. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 25(1), 67-87. [CrossRef]
📄Mao, E. (2021). The structural characteristics of esports gaming and their behavioral implications for high engagement: A competition perspective and a cross-cultural examination. Addictive Behaviors, 123, 107056. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
📄Siriphunwaraphon, C., Tongtep, N., & Charoenporn, T. (2016). Human personality toward digital gameplay analytics for edutainment-based instructional design. In 2016 International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (pp. 47–51). IEEE.
📄Abbasi, A. Z., Asif, M., Hollebeek, L., Islam, J., Ting, D., & Rehman, U. (2020). The effects of consumer esports videogame engagement on consumption behaviors. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 30(8), 1194-1211. [CrossRef]
