The Pedagogical Impact of Microsoft Designer: A Survey On Educational Development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15673022

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligent , Microsoft Designer , Pedagogical Application , Educational Development

Abstract

  The integration of AI-empowered tool such as Microsoft designer into educational paradigm has helped educators as well as students to enhance the creation of visual appealing materials used for interactive presentation. Microsoft Designer is an AI driven graphic design interface that empowers users to create high-grade visual content with minimal effort. Microsoft Designer offers a vast library of templates, icons, and images,, along with innovative design suggestions empowered to meet up with the specific needs of an individual or organization. The implementation of Microsoft Designer with other Microsoft 365 applications, is designed to enhance workflow and allow for easy collaboration effort. The implementation ensures that users can easily import and export content across all paradigms, maintaining their quality and consistency in various aspects of design. This paper study examines the integration of Microsoft Designer into educational settings to enhance the creation of visually appealing materials for interactive presentations. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving the distribution of carefully designed questionnaires via Google Forms to educators and students. The collected responses underwent reliability analysis to ensure data validityThe findings reveal that Microsoft Designer significantly improves users’ ability to produce high-quality visual content with minimal design expertise, thereby enriching educational presentations and communication. The tool’s accessibility and integration capabilities support consistent and efficient design processes across various educational tasks. Finally, the paper concludes that Microsoft Designer is a powerful AI driven tool that serves various categories of users, from students to professionals, enhancing visual creativity without prior design experience. 

References

Abbas, A. M. H., Ghauth, K. I. & Ting, C. Y. (2022). User Experience Design using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review. IEEE Acess, 10, 51501-51514. [CrossRef]

Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2023). The Future of AI and Learning: Experts’ Views on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Pew Research Center.

Begström, E., & Wärnestål, P. (2022). Exploring The Design Context Of AI-Powered Services: A Qualitative Investigation of Designers’ Experiences with Machine Learning. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; 3-21. [CrossRef]

Chalyi, O. (2024). An Evaluation of General-Purpose AI Chatbots: A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis. InfoScience Trends, 1(1), 52-66. [CrossRef]

Chena, L., Wang, P., Dong, H., Shia, F., Han, J., Guo, Y., et al. (2019). An Artificial Intelligence Based Data-Diven Approach for Design Ideation. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation. Vol. 61. Pp. 1-22. [CrossRef]

EdSurge. (2023). How AI-Powered Design Tools Are Transforming Education. Available at.

Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in Education: Strategies for Responsible Implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2). ep421. [CrossRef]

Mosly, I. (2024). Artificial Intelligence’s Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Curricular Design: A Combined Review and Focus Group Study. Societies, 14, 89. [CrossRef]

Kim, M., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Teachers as Designers: Pedagogical Implications of AI-Generated Content in Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 547-573. [CrossRef]

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Li, N., & Chandra, V. (2022). Integrating AI into Classroom Design Projects: A Case Study on Microsoft Designer. Proceedings of the International Society for Technology in Education(ISTE). [CrossRef]

Lu, Y., Zhang, I. & Li, T.J (2022). Bridging the Gap Between User Experience Paractitioners’ work and AI-Enabled Design Support Tools. CHI Confrence on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 268, 1-7. [CrossRef]

Martins, F., Almeida, M.F., Calili, R. & Oliveira A. (2020). Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective.Sustainability,12(23),10031. [CrossRef]

Microsoft Education Blog. (2023). Microsoft Designer in Education: Unlocking Student Creativity with AI.Available at. https://learn.microsoft.com/tr-tr/training/educator-center/?source=mec

Kanta, S. M. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(7), 1002–1006 .[CrossRef]

Nikiforova, O., Zabiniako, V., Kornienko, J., Gasparovica-Asite, M. & Silina, A. (2021). Mapping of Source and target Data for Application to Machine Learning Driven Discovery of IS Usability Problems. Applied Computer Systems, 26(1), 22-30. [CrossRef]

Verganti, R., Vendraminelli, L. & Iansiti, M. (2020). Innovation and design in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(3), 212-227. [CrossRef]

Abbasi, A. Z., Asif, M., Hollebeek, L., Islam, J., Ting, D., & Rehman, U. (2020). The effects of consumer esports videogame engagement on consumption behaviors. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 30(8), 1194-1211. [CrossRef]

Downloads

Published

2025-06-20

How to Cite

Agoi, M. A., Oshinowo, O. R., Agoi, O. O., & Muraina, I. O. (2025). The Pedagogical Impact of Microsoft Designer: A Survey On Educational Development. Journal of Sports Industry & Blockchain Technology, 2(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15673022